image Dietrich


back to all projects

Judgment Aggregation Theory

In collaboration with Christian List, I study how a collective can form judgments on interconnected propositions, based on the judgments of its members. For instance, how can an expert panel assess whether global warming is accelerating, whether an acceleration would increase worldwide inequality, and whether inequality reduction should be a policy goal? Collective judgments should be at the same time logically coherent and democratically responsive to individual judgments — a double objective that is hard to meet. The question of the right procedure is wide open. Judgment aggregation has many applications and attracts interest from various disciplines, such as economics, philosophy, political science, jurisprudence, artificial intelligence, and logic.

Related Work

back to all projects